Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

EPA study supports more natural gas

Written By limadu on Sabtu, 22 Desember 2012 | 04.32

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

"As the administration and EPA has made clear, natural gas has a central role to play in our energy future," the agency said in a press release. "The administration continues to work to expand production of this important domestic resource safely and responsibly."

EPA outlined several steps it's taking to assess the impacts fracking -- short for hydraulic fracturing -- has on the nation's water supply, as directed by Congress in 2009.

Steps include:

-- Analyzing existing data from natural gas companies on chemicals and practices used

-- Modeling how discharging waste might impact the water

-- Lab testing on water discharge

-- Testing fracking chemicals for toxicity

-- Testing groundwater in five regions near drilling activity

As expected, the study contained no new data or conclusions. The final results are not expected until late 2014.

Related: World's 10 most expensive energy projects

Some see the lack of data or negative comments in Friday's progress report as a positive for the industry.

"It signals that the Obama administration has no real appetite for additional federal regulations until 2014 at the earliest," said Nitzan Goldberger, a natural gas analyst at Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. "That's good news for the oil and gas guys."

The Obama administration has tightened some rules around fracking, but for the most part has left regulation up to the states.

Fracking involves injecting massive amounts of water, sand and some chemicals deep underground in a bid to crack shale rock and ease the flow of oil and natural gas.

The process has unleashed an energy boom in the United States, creating thousands of jobs, driving down the price of oil and natural gas and cutting energy imports to levels not seen in decades.

But it's also raised serious concerns over its effects on the environment, including air pollution from trucks and wells, its links to earthquakes and fears that it is contaminating drinking water.

For environmentalists, the negatives seem to outweigh the positives.

Fracking was once seen by some environmentalists as a technology that, given the proper regulations, could be done safely and provide a fuel that emits far fewer greenhouse gases than coal. Natural gas was seen as a good alternative to coal, at least until renewables like wind and solar were ready for prime time.

But declining costs for renewables, more instances of water contamination, uncertainly over the heat-trappng nature of natural gas that escapes from wells unburned, and a fear that cheap gas is crowding out wind and solar have led many to change their minds.

Several environmental groups are calling for an immediate ban on fracking, while others favor a gradual phase out combined with greater federal regulation.

On the other side are many analysts and economists that believe this technology can give the United States a significant economic and geopolitical advantage. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 2:54 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Going over the cliff: What changes, what doesn't

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may need to do some heavy lifting to pass a fiscal cliff deal in the Senate, after House Speaker John Boehner's so-called Plan B did not garner enough support in the House.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The good news: It won't be the end of the world.

The bad news: Going over the cliff could create problems that no one should have to deal with, simply because Congress and the White House couldn't get the job done on time.

Practically speaking, however, there is likely to be a "grace period" of a couple of weeks during which Congress could pass a deal to ward off the bulk of scheduled tax increases and spending cuts. And there are ways both may be postponed temporarily while lawmakers work that out.

Your paycheck: If you'll be paid during the first week in January, your company's payroll processor will probably be cutting your check during Christmas week. So far, however, the IRS hasn't told the payroll companies how much tax to withhold for 2013.

Unless new withholding tables are issued, payroll processors will continue to use 2012 withholding rates for the early January paychecks. In that sense, your paycheck in early January won't be much different than what it was in late December.

But your paycheck still could be smaller, because the 2% payroll tax holiday is expiring. Starting in January, workers will once again have 6.2% of their wages up to $113,700 withheld to pay for Social Security, up from the 4.2% rate that's been in effect for the past two years.

Effectively that means someone making $50,000 might get about $83 less a month in their paychecks. Someone making twice that would see their pay reduced by roughly $167 a month.

If you're getting a bonus, you'll likely have more withheld there, too, said Michael O'Toole, senior director of government relations for the American Payroll Association. That's because there's one supplemental withholding rate that applies to bonuses. This year it's 25%, but it's set to rise to 28% on Jan. 1, unless Congress decides to change it.

For paychecks that will be cut during the second, third and fourth weeks of January, payroll processors will likely continue to use 2012 income tax withholding tables if they've heard nothing from Treasury and the IRS by that point, O'Toole said.

CNN: Breakdown of support for Plan B

There also is some debate whether Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner will have the authority to tell employers that they should continue to use the 2012 withholding tables until further notice if he chooses.

The other option, of course, is that the IRS could issue new withholding tables reflecting 2013 law, which means everyone's tax rates will go up officially on Jan. 1. In that case, paychecks that are processed in January will have more withheld than they do currently.

If, as expected, Congress eventually chooses to extend the Bush tax cuts for all but the highest earners, adjustments would need to be made for paychecks that went out earlier in the year.

Treasury did not indicate to CNNMoney whether it would issue new withholding tables by Jan. 1.

Your 401(k) and IRA: There's no telling how markets will respond if fiscal cliff gridlock persists into 2013.

They've been relatively sanguine so far. But that may not be the case going forward.

After news that House Speaker John Boehner tabled Plan B because it lacked sufficient support, U.S. stocks fell Friday by just under 1%. World markets also ended the day modestly in the red.

Then again, some believe, markets may not move much on fiscal cliff news - whether Congress cuts a deal soon or not.

Your 2012 tax return: Here's where things potentially become a dumb mess. The IRS warned lawmakers that if they don't act to protect the middle class from having to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax for tax year 2012 by Dec. 31, up to 100 million taxpayers may not be able to file their 2012 taxes until late March.

That would mean their refunds will be delayed. And they wouldn't be injecting those refunds into the economy during the first quarter.

Based on Treasury Department records from the past three years, refunds paid during January, February and March combined have ranged from $117 billion to $136 billion.

Related: What's in the fiscal cliff?

Government spending: Unless lawmakers avert the so-called sequester, a series of automatic cuts will reduce the budgets of most federal agencies and programs by 8% to 10%.

But that doesn't necessarily mean those cuts would have to occur immediately, according to a former official with the Office of Management and Budget.

Both the White House budget office and federal agencies themselves will have some latitude to postpone the cuts from occurring "for several weeks if necessary," added OMB Watch, a group that monitors the federal budget.

The White House Budget Office did not respond to questions from CNNMoney.

Doctors' pay: Absent a fiscal cliff deal that includes a so-called "doc fix," Medicare physicians are facing a nearly 27% cut in their payments for treating Medicare patients.

But here again there may be a few weeks' grace period for Congress to change its mind and reverse the cut. That's because a claim submitted will be paid no less than two weeks after it's received.

Unemployment benefits: A federal extension of unemployment benefits is set to expire. If Congress does not renew it, workers who lost their jobs after July 1, 2012, will only receive up to 26 weeks in state unemployment benefits, down from as many as 73 weeks in state and federal benefits that have been available in 2012. As a result, more than 2 million of the long-term unemployed will run out of benefits in January, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.

If Congress chooses early next year to keep the extension in place, and makes the extension retroactive, then many of the 2 million who fell off the rolls may be paid retroactively, said Rick McHugh, a NELP staff attorney. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 4:39 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Dairy cliff': Milk prices may double in New Year

If Congress doesn't act on an expiring protection for dairy farmers before Jan 1, milk prices could double.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

With Congress spending all its time trying to avert the fiscal cliff, a slew of other legislative matters are going unattended. One of them is the agriculture bill which, if not addressed, could lead to a doubling of the price of milk early next year.

It works like this: In order to keep dairy farmers in businesses, the government agrees to buy milk and other products if the price gets too low. The current agriculture bill has a formula that means the government steps in if the price of milk were to drop by roughly half from its current national average of about $3.65 a gallon.

Problem is, the current bill expired last summer, and Congress had been unable to agree on a new one. Several protections for farmers have already expired, and several more are set to do so over the next few months. One of them is the dairy subsidy, which expires January 1.

But instead of leaving farmers entirely out in the cold, the law states that if a new bill isn't passed or the current one extended, the formula for calculating the price the government pays for dairy products reverts back to a 1949 statute. Under that formula, the government would be forced to buy milk at twice today's price -- driving up the cost for everyone.

"If you like anything made with milk, you're going to be impacted by the fact that there's no farm bill," U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack told CNN's Candy Crowley in an interview on State of the Union airing Sunday, Dec. 30.

"Consumers are going to be a bit shocked when instead of seeing $3.60 a gallon for milk, they see $7 a gallon for milk. And that's going to ripple throughout all of the commodities if this thing goes on for an extended period of time," Vilsack said.

Related: Independent farms rake in millions

Sky-high milk prices wouldn't necessarily be good for dairy farmers either, according to Chris Galen, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation, which represents over 30,000 dairy farmers.

While it might provide a short term boost to profits, there's a fear that consumers would either cut back on dairy or opt for imported dairy products. It could also force food makers to search for alternatives to dairy, like soy.

"We call it the dairy cliff," Galen said.

Fortunately, there's still time for Congress to act.

Galen said the government would have to issue a notice saying it was going to pay the increased price for dairy products, then set up a schedule for when purchases would start, a process that could take a few weeks.

"It's not like people would dump blocks of cheese on the USDA's front lawn January first," he said.

To prevent the price spike, Congress either needs to extend the current bill, pass a new bill, or enact some provision to keep the 1949 law from taking effect.

Given the current state of the fiscal cliff talks and Congress' inability to get things done in general, dairy lovers might want to stock up now. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 3:31 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Holiday tipping: Who to tip and how much

Written By limadu on Jumat, 21 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Etiquette experts suggest tipping what you pay for one session of service, such as one house cleaning visit or a personal training session.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Roughly 60% of Americans gave at least one holiday tip last year, with house cleaners being the most common recipients, according to a Consumer Reports poll released this month.

"I think of it as an opportunity to say 'thank you' rather than an obligation," said Peter Post, director of The Emily Post Institute and the great-grandson of late etiquette guru Emily Post.

Related: How far will your salary go in another city?

Still, figuring out who to tip and how much can be vexing. Post recommends writing down all the people who provide services to you on a regular basis so you can come up with a tipping budget.

A typical rule of thumb: Give cash or a gift that is equal in value to one session of service, such as a housecleaning visit or one night of babysitting. But with many households fallen on hard times, Post said there are other ways to express gratitude, such as baked goods or a personal note.

"If you can't give a tip, at least provide a card with a nice heartfelt note in it so you could have some way of showing appreciation," he said.

Just don't give your mail carrier any cash. They are barred from taking it. But they can accept food or small gifts worth less than $20, said Post.

Related: Gift cards charging fees of $25 (or more)

Where you live can also influence how much you dole out and what you give.

New York City is an epicenter of tipping, said Consumer Reports senior editor Tobie Stanger.

For example, Manhattan resident Teri Rogers, who offers apartment dwellers tipping guidelines on her New York real estate site, Brick Underground, has a laundry list of people she plans to tip in cash this year, including her building's superintendent, a garage attendant, house cleaner and a dog walker.

Yet, in other locales, baked goods would be more the norm.

"It's very personal. It's regional," said Stanger. To top of page

How much should you tip?

Etiquette experts at The Emily Post Institute provide these guidelines for holiday tipping.

SERVICE PROVIDER SUGGESTED TIP
Au pair or live-in nanny One week's pay and a gift from your kids
Regular babysitter One evening's pay and a small gift from your kids
Housekeeper/Cleaner Up to the amount of one week's pay and/or a small gift
Dog walker Up to one week's pay or gift
Newspaper delivery person $10-$30 or a small gift
Garage attendants $10-30 or a small gift
Doorman $15-$80
Building superintendent $20-$80
Trash/Recycling collectors
$10-30 each. If it is a municipal service, then check city regulations first
Yard/Garden worker $20-$50 each
Mail carrier Small gift that is no more than $20 in value

Source: The Emily Post Institute

First Published: December 21, 2012: 5:09 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

UK lawmakers urge tougher banking reform

LONDON (CNNMoney)

Government plans to ring-fence British banks' retail operations in order to protect assets from riskier investment activities could make the system more stable but they did not go far enough, the parliamentary commission on banking standards stated in its first report.

The commission warned that proposed legislation risked creating a "paper tiger," and recommended "electrification" for the ring-fence.

"The legislation needs to set out a reserve power for separation, and the regulator needs to know he can use it," said Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the cross-party commission of lawmakers from both houses of parliament.

Tyrie also said the commission would consider in early 2013 whether Britain should adopt its own version of the U.S. Volcker Rule, which would prevent banks from engaging in proprietary trading.

The U.K. government spent some $100 billion buying majority stakes in two of the country's biggest lenders -- the Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds -- to prevent their collapse at the height of the financial crisis in 2008.

The banking commission was created earlier this year, after Barclays admitted it tried to rig Libor global benchmark interest rates. The commission was then was asked by the government to review the ring-fencing proposal.

Related: EU strikes deal to bring banks under single supervisor

The British Bankers' Association, which represents 200 banks from 60 countries, said it was committed to taking steps to prevent future bailouts. However, it said the new rules need to strike a balance between creating a flexible ring-fence and regulatory clarity for banks and their investors.

"Too much uncertainty will deter investment and could hurt London's position as the world's leading financial center," said BBA chief executive Anthony Browne in a statement.

In a sign of how much damage has been done to the banking industry's reputation by the financial crisis and the Libor-rigging scandal, among others, the commission said banks could not be trusted to uphold the spirit and letter of the new rules without the threat of ultimate break-up at the hand of the regulator.

Related: HSBC pays $1.9 billion to settle US probe

"For the ring-fence to succeed, banks need to be discouraged from gaming the rules," Tyrie said in a statement. "All history tells us they will do this unless incentivised not to."

Two former UBS traders were charged earlier this week by U.S. authorities with attempting to rig borrowing interest rates, in collusion with other banks and brokers.

The Swiss bank will pay $1.5 billion in penalties to authorities in the U.S., U.K. and Switzerland after an investigation revealed that dozens of staff, including senior managers, tried to manipulate Libor to benefit their own trading positions and make the bank look more creditworthy than it was.

The U.K. parliamentary commission also said it accepted the government's view that simple derivatives could be sold by retail banks, but stated that those derivatives would need to be clearly defined. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 6:40 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

RIM pays up to license Nokia patents

LONDON (CNNMoney)

Nokia did not disclose the financial terms but said the new patent license agreement would settle all existing litigation between the companies, including actions pending in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada. It also includes a one-off payment from Research in Motion (RIMM) to Nokia (NOK).

Nokia had sought to ban the sale of some Blackberry devices after a Swedish tribunal ruled in November that RIM was not entitled to sell products using wireless LAN patents without paying Nokia royalties.

"This agreement demonstrates Nokia's industry-leading patent portfolio and enables us to focus on further licensing opportunities in the mobile communications market," Nokia's chief intellectual property officer said in a statement.

During the last two decades, Nokia said it has invested about 45 billion euros in research and development, building a portfolio of around 10,000 patent families.

Nokia has fallen behind other smartphone providers such as Samsung and Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) and is looking to make more money from licensing its technology.

Related: Ericsson sues Samsung over patents

RIM is also looking to move forward with the January launch of its new Blackberry 10 operating system and smartphone, aimed at allowing the company to compete again with Apple's iPhone and Google (GOOG, Fortune 500)'s Android.

RIM announced a 47% fall in third quarter revenue on Thursday, sending its shares down nearly 10% in pre-market trading Friday. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 7:28 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

'I may lose my unemployment benefits'

Written By limadu on Kamis, 20 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Karen Duckett, 51, of Maryland, is among 2 million jobless who will stop getting unemployment benefits starting Dec. 29 unless Congress saves them.

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney)

Duckett, 51, of Laurel, Md., is among 2.1 million jobless Americans whose unemployment benefits will end on Dec. 29, if Congress doesn't act.

After a 30-year career, managing housekeeping staff at a retirement community, Duckett was laid off last year. Despite looking for a job every day, she hasn't been able to find work. Duckett says if her unemployment benefits run out, she and her 14-year-old grandson, who lives with her, won't have enough money to eat.

"It's been a very difficult year," Duckett said. "The check keeps a roof over our head. ... I can't even imagine what we're going to do without that check."

She is among 2.1 million Americans who will no longer be able to apply for unemployment benefits in the New Year. Another 1 million people who don't have jobs will also exhaust their state benefits in early 2013 and lose their benefits, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.

During the recession, as unemployment rates rose over 10%, the government put in place an emergency program to extend federal benefits to the jobless, whose state unemployment insurance had run out. Currently, federal unemployment benefits are available for up to 47 weeks, depending on the state.

The cost to extend the benefits by another year is $30 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It's a little piece of the $7 trillion in tax increases and spending cuts that will take effect as part of the fiscal cliff. It's also a relatively small cost compared to other expenses, such as the payroll tax cut, which will cost $115 billion.

Majority of Americans have received government aid

Democrats have championed an extension of the benefits. President Obama said Wednesday during a press conference that he wasn't willing to give tax breaks to millionaires while "not providing unemployment insurance for 2 million people who are still out there looking for work."

Republicans have been cool to the extension. They say they're open to the idea only if it doesn't add to federal deficits. Finding $30 billion to "pay for" rising deficits could be tricky enough to scuttle a deal.

Several economists have said the economic recovery needs it.

"It is important to continue on with the emergency unemployment insurance program. It is providing a boost to economic growth," said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics.

If Congress does extend unemployment benefits, it would be the 10th extension since the Great Recession began in December 2007. Congress first enacted an extension to the federal benefits package in June 2008.

Some 40% of the roughly 12 million people currently unemployed have been jobless for more than six months, according to NELP.

Duckett is one of the long term unemployed. That's why she hit Capitol Hill on Tuesday, along with 50 other unemployed workers -- organized by the Philadelphia Unemployment Project. The advocacy group hoped their stories would push lawmakers to work toward a deal to extend federal benefits until the economy improves.

"I opened my mailbox a week ago and got the notice warning me that I would not be receiving any more checks," said Duckett, a breast cancer survivor, with tears streaming down her cheeks. "That gives me two weeks to see what we're going to do." To top of page

First Published: December 20, 2012: 5:10 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Gift cards charging fees of $25 (or more)

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Depending on the type of gift card you buy, you could end up paying $25 or more in purchase and shipping fees -- and that's before the maintenance fees kick in.

Bank-issued cards tend to be the biggest culprits, according to a November survey conducted by Bankrate. While all eight of the popular general-purpose gift cards offered by banks and credit card companies charged purchase fees, only five of 55 retail gift cards Bankrate surveyed charged them.

Purchase fees averaged $4.50 per card. American Express (AXP, Fortune 500) and U.S. Bank (USB, Fortune 500) Visa cards were the worst offenders, with purchase fees as high as $6.95.

Related: Starbucks limited-edition gift cards spark eBay frenzy

And while federal law now prevents all gift cards from expiring within 5 years of purchase, general purpose cards are more likely to charge so-called "maintenance" or "dormancy" fees, monthly charges that can reduce the card's remaining balance long before the five years are up. By law, these fees can't kick in until at least 12 months after purchase.

If you receive a $25 Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) Visa gift card that goes unused for 18 months, for example, six months of $2.50 monthly maintenance charges would drop the card's balance to $10. Within two years, the balance would be entirely gone.

"The biggest tip we could ever give is use them before you lose them," said Bill Hardekopf, chief executive officer of credit information site lowcards.com.

Of the retail, restaurant, travel and gas gift cards Bankrate surveyed, only one company — Pilot Travel Center — charged maintenance fees. That contrasts with six out of eight of the general purpose cards surveyed, which charged between $2.50 and $3 a month.

Related: 12 ways you're wasting money

Consumers should also look out for exorbitant shipping fees associated with some online card purchases. With shipping charges ranging from $13.50 to $27.50, Shell (RDSA) gas stations had the highest average delivery cost of all cards surveyed. US Airways (LCC, Fortune 500) came in second with $15 two-day delivery as the only shipping option.

But these shipping costs can be avoided altogether. Roughly half of the card issuers surveyed offer e-gift cards that can be printed or sent via e-mail, and many will ship physical gift cards for free. Most cards can also be purchased at retailer's brick-and-mortar locations.

For those gift givers unable to decide on a retailer, cash or checks are another alternative, said Odysseas Papadimitriou, chief executive officer of credit card comparison site CardHub.com.

Related: Smartphone shopper pays $48K for a bulldozer

"If you are going to gift an American Express or Visa gift card, why not give a check at that point," he said. "So then you avoid the fees and you are allowing the person to use the money for a broader set of reasons."

Card recipients should also make sure to read the fine print in order to make sure they get the full value of the card, Hardekopf said.

"Gift cards are a wonderful thing, you just have to use them properly and research them thoroughly," he said. "As a recipient, you should really read the terms and conditions right after the guests leave on the holidays."

Here are some other tips to consider:

  • Avoid prepaid credit cards. While they look like gift cards, prepaid cards are actually different and tend to have more and higher fees.
  • Check out online gift card exchanges. Like Craigslist for unused or unwanted gift cards, these sites -- where you can buy or sell unwanted gift cards -- can sometimes be home to a bargain.
  • Look for loss or theft policies. While some issuers will replace cards for free, others charge high replacement fees or won't replace lost or stolen cards at all.
  • Use credit card rewards. Some rewards programs allow consumers to purchase gift cards with a higher redemption value than cash back rewards, providing more bang for your buck.
To top of page

Gift cards with the biggest fees

Bankrate's survey of 63 gift cards found bank's general purpose cards tend to charge the biggest fees.

GIFT CARD ISSUER PURCHASE/SHIPPING FEES MAINTENANCE AND OTHER FEES
Wells Fargo Visa $3.95 purchase fee/$1.50 shipping charge when ordered online Beginning 12 months after activation, $2.50 monthly fee
BMO Harris Bank MasterCard $4 purchase fee/online purchase unavailable After 12 consecutive months of inactivity, $3 monthly fee
U.S. Bank Visa $3.95 fee for branch purchase, $6.95 fee for online purchase/$6.95-$18 shipping charge After 12 consecutive months of inactivity, $2.50 monthly fee
KeyBank MasterCard $3.95 issuance fee/online purchase unavailable Beginning 12 months after issuance, $2.50 monthly fee/$1.00 ATM withdrawal fee, 25 cents ATM balance inquiry fee/$9.95 refund processing fee
Chase Visa $3.50 fee for brand purchase, no fee for online purchase/$4.95-$20.90 shipping charges Beginning 12 months after purchase date, $2.50 monthly fee
Discover $3.95 purchase fee/free standard shipping, $9.95 express shipping charge After 12 consecutive months of inactivity, $2.50 monthly fee
American Express $2.95-$6.95 purchase fee depending on card/$5.95-$15.95 shipping charges No maintenance fees
Fifth Third Bank MasterCard Purchase fees vary depending on card amount/online purchase unavailable No maintenance fees
Shell 3.5% handling fee when ordered online/$13.50-$27.50 shipping charges No maintenance fees
US Airways No purchase fee/$15 shipping charge No maintenance fees

Source: Bankrate.com

First Published: December 20, 2012: 5:20 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Reverse mortgage: Is it too risky?

Considering a reverse mortgage to drum up retirement cash? Don't tap your home's equity too hard.

(Money Magazine)

The pitch may sound appealing, especially if you're among the 83% of boomers who plan to stay in their home through retirement: Tap your home's equity now and receive a monthly payment, line of credit, or lump sum, regardless of your credit score or income.

The mortgage will start accruing interest immediately, but you won't need to pay back a dime until you move out or die -- at which point you or your heirs must repay the bank in full.

Indeed, reverse mortgages can be a good option for seniors age 70 or older who are committed to staying in their homes and don't have the savings to cover their expenses, says elder-law attorney Janet Colliton of West Chester, Pa.

However, she adds that recent trends are making the loans a riskier proposition. For one, borrowers are younger: Last year 47% were in their sixties, more than double the percentage from 2001. A growing number (69%) are also taking their payout in a lump sum rather than a steady stream. And reports say predatory lenders have been pushing these mortgages on folks who can't afford them.

Related: Finding real estate opportunities in the New Year

The result: Borrowers who take the loan too soon, or spend the payout too quickly, could end up without a source of equity to fall back on -- and might even lose their homes.

If you or someone you love is thinking about a reverse mortgage, consider these questions. If you answer yes to even one, this type of loan is probably the wrong option for you.

Are you in your sixties?

You want to put off a reverse mortgage as long as possible. The amount you can borrow is based on the current interest rate (you can borrow more when it's lower), your home equity, and the age of the younger spouse. The older he or she is, the more you get.

On a $300,000 house with a $100,000 mortgage, for instance, a 75-year-old might receive a $574 monthly payment, while a 65-year-old would get just $411. (See reversemortgage.org for a calculator.)

Related: Your pension: Lump sum or lifetime benefits?

Younger borrowers also face more years of compound interest, which can quickly ratchet up the amount you owe.

There's also a greater chance that you'll run into unexpected medical bills or other expenses as you age, sapping your payout more quickly than you anticipated.

Will the costs be more than you can afford?

Reverse mortgages are a notoriously expensive way to tap equity.

For that borrower with the $300,000 home, fees would include $6,000 in upfront mortgage insurance, a $2,500 origination fee, and about $3,400 in traditional closing costs -- and that's before you get to the monthly mortgage insurance premium of 1.25% of the loan balance.

Related: Why home insurance costs so much

Plus, you'll still need to cover regular housing expenses such as taxes and maintenance.

Don't commit to the loan until you've met with an independent financial adviser to go over the total cost and discuss alternatives, says Steve Weisman, author of A Guide to Elder Planning.

Is there a better option?

Before turning to a reverse mortgage, homeowners should explore bolstering their finances by downsizing or working longer.

Those with good credit might also consider a traditional refinance or a home-equity line of credit (HELOC), where you draw only the funds you need and pay off interest as you go, says Waterford, Conn., financial planner Nancy Butler.

It's also a good idea to get your heirs involved -- particularly since they'll be responsible for paying off (or selling your house to pay off) the loan after your death. They may be able to provide a private reverse mortgage or become a part owner of the house now.

Ultimately, people should think very carefully before draining their home equity, says Margot Saunders, counsel at the National Consumer Law Center: "Once it's gone, it's gone." To top of page

Timing It Right

Taking a reverse mortgage when you're too young -- especially as a lump sum -- can leave you with no home equity in your old age.

For a 65-year-old borrower with a $300,000 home and a $100,000 mortgage
Lump-sum payment $79,233
Remaining equity
After 5 years $103,255
After 10 yers $85,496
After 20 years $0

NOTES: Assumes an HECM standard loan on a home in Tulsa, annual appreciation of 4%. Interest rate is 5.06%. SOURCE: Urban Financial Group

First Published: December 20, 2012: 5:31 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Budget experts: Fiscal cliff deal could disappoint

Written By limadu on Rabu, 19 Desember 2012 | 04.32

President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner may agree to tax increases and spending cuts. But if their deal lacks lots of detail, budget experts are dubious it will amount to as much as advertised.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

So they are watching closely to see what kind of a deal the White House and Congress make to avert the fiscal cliff.

Such a deal could lead to a "grand bargain" that tackles long-term debt reduction in a smart way. Or not, if lawmakers choose to punt. Or it could be something in between that rests more on promises than specifics.

Here are three key issues to consider when assessing any deal that President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner agree to.

Tax and entitlement reforms: Reforming the tax code and entitlement spending will be key to reducing deficits in the long run.

But since Congress and the White House have waited until the last minute to negotiate, no one expects them to reach a grand bargain with all the details hammered out.

But, budget experts say, there needs to be a strong "framework" agreement that paves the way for substantial debt reduction without upending the economy in the near term.

Such an agreement would postpone most fiscal cliff measures -- since they threaten the recovery next year. It would also include some sort of small down payment for deficit reduction and further require that Congress pass a large, long-term debt reduction package by a given date next year.

What's in the fiscal cliff?

The package would have to meet agreed-upon revenue and spending targets, through tax and entitlement reform as well as spending cuts in other parts of the budget. Negotiators would ideally also set more specific targets for individual areas of the budget.

In addition, the agreement should have an effective enforcement mechanism to ensure such a package is passed.

Budget experts are dubious, however, that much will be accomplished if the framework simply promises reforms later, sets a topline number for spending cuts and revenue increases and offers few specifics.

"In the absence of bond market pressure, it is hard to be too optimistic that Congress will either complete these 2013 tax and entitlement reform processes or refrain from filling in the blanks with gimmicks," said Sean West, U.S. policy director of the Eurasia Group.

Budget gimmicks: Experts say Congress needs to enact at least $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years to start curbing the growth in debt.

But not all $4 trillion plans are created equal. Everything depends on what's counted.

For example, lawmakers could agree to $2 trillion in tax hikes and spending cuts. Then to advertise it as a $4 trillion deal, they might add the savings already enacted under the Budget Control Act as well as so-called war "savings." That's the money the country will no longer need to borrow because the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are winding down.

Of course, such a plan would do less to curb growth in the debt than a plan that achieves $4 trillion in debt reduction on top of Budget Control Act and war savings.

And in reality, West noted, such a deal could end up delivering less than $1 trillion in new savings if many of the actual spending cuts are not specified in the deal.

Debt ceiling: The country's legal borrowing limit needs to be raised in the next 10 weeks or so if lawmakers don't want the federal government to risk defaulting on U.S. debt.

If a final deal doesn't include an increase, lawmakers will be in for what could be another dog fight over the debt ceiling.

The political brinksmanship that marked the debt ceiling fight in 2011 earned the United States its first-ever credit downgrade and rocked stock markets. The threat of a similar fight in early 2013 will leave both investors and the economy in a tough spot until the matter is resolved. To top of page

First Published: December 19, 2012: 6:18 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger