Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

China stocks rebound as data improves

Written By limadu on Senin, 31 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Click chart for more markets data.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

But favorable economic reports and the prospect of market reform has drawn investors back in this month, driving the index into positive territory for the year and 16% above its early December low.

As recently as Dec. 3, the index was down 9% on the year. At the same point, the Nikkei was up more than 10%, the FTSE 100 was up 3%, and Germany's DAX had skyrocketed 22%. In the United States, the S&P 500 had more than doubled from its recession lows, jumping 10% since January.

But China's marquee index has mounted a robust rally over the past month, helped by strong manufacturing, industrial and trade data. On Monday, HSBC's manufacturing PMI index, a key indicator, hit its highest level in 19 months in December. And last week, Beijing reported industrial profits were up more than 20% year over year.

Buoyed by the reports, the Shanghai Composite closed the year at 2,269 points on Monday, up 3% since January.

China's economy is still expanding at an annual rate of 7% to 8%, but it has slowed somewhat from figures that often exceeded 10% before the global financial crisis.

The slowing pace of growth -- still the envy of many nations -- has weighed on stocks. For much of 2012, listed companies reported lackluster profits while retail investors abandoned stocks in favor of higher returns on alternative investments, especially physical property, wealth management and trust products.

Related: Chinese firms go on U.S. spending spree

But the latest round of data seems to have encouraged investors. The index's rebound has also been fueled by hints at greater regulatory reform -- especially signals from policymakers that more foreign investment will be allowed.

"Foreign investors are becoming more sanguine on the A-share market, while domestic investor sentiment appears to be finally bottoming," equity analysts at HSBC wrote in a recent report.

The HSBC analysts, who are bullish on the Shanghai Composite's performance, predict that improving economic conditions, coupled with rising risk appetite, positive fund flows and structural reforms, should lead to higher returns in 2013.

Still, stumbling blocks remain, and the detailed intentions of China's new leadership are not widely known.

"The second wave of reform is set to be considerably more difficult and internally-focused than the first, as the government strives to better align government and markets through further price reform, stimulate demand through new-style urbanization, improve income distribution and enhance supply discipline by breaking up state monopolies," HSBC's analysts wrote. To top of page

First Published: December 31, 2012: 4:04 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Assault rifles are selling out

Dennis Pratte, owner of My Gun Factory in Falls Church, Va., said the demand for semiautomatic rifles is outstripping supply.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

"Our phones are ringing every 10 seconds and people are saying, 'Do you have any assault rifles?'" said Dennis Pratte, owner of My Gun Factory in Falls Church, Va., a store that also sells products online. "They've sold out of just about every gun shop nationwide and just about every distributor is out of stock."

Online retailers are running out of semiautomatic rifles -- known variously as assault weapons, tactical rifles or modern sporting rifles -- and magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds.

Brick-and-mortar gun shops are also working furiously to meet demand. Semiautomatic rifles, which fire one round for every pull of the trigger, and high-capacity magazines are flying off the shelves.

"The retail market is completely sold out of anything with high-capacity magazines," said Pratte. "We get people 20-deep waiting to buy."

Pratte said that he sells AR-15s as soon as they arrive at his store, before he even has the time to display them on the wall. Handguns are also hot commodities, especially from popular makers such as Smith & Wesson (SWHC), he said.

He said that prices are soaring, and not just for guns. High-capacity magazines, particularly the popular 30-round magazines, are going for $100 apiece on Gunbroker.com, a bidding site like Ebay (EBAY, Fortune 500). He said they used to sell for $15.

"Ammunition is hard to come by, as well," Pratte said, noting that ammunition for military-style semiautomatic rifles has tripled in price to about one dollar per bullet.

Related: Cheap ammo for sale online

Online retailers have depleted their stock of magazines containing 30, 60 or even 100 rounds.

"Due to tremendous demand, high-capacity magazine orders will be delayed," reads a notice at Surefire.com, which has sold out of $179 banana-shaped magazines capable of holding 100 rounds.

Likewise, the ungainly-looking 100-round dual-drums, which resemble a pair of cans stuck together, have sold out at Cheaperthandirt.com and Impactguns.com.

Even the manufacturers are running dry. Beta Mag makes 100-round dual-drums for rifles and even handguns, including a drum for Glock, which was featured in the latest James Bond movie, "Skyfall." But it has gotten difficult to order them through the company's Web site, where the high-capacity drums are listed as "available for purchase" but "back ordered."

The product's popularity is matched only by its controversy. A 100-round drum was allegedly used as part of the four-gun arsenal of James Holmes, accused of shooting 70 people and killing 12 at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo., on July 20.

High-capacity magazines have been used in numerous mass shootings, including the Dec. 14 attack at a school in Newtown, Conn. Police said that Adam Lanza loaded his Bushmaster rifle with multiple 30-round magazines to shoot and kill 20 school children and six educators before committing suicide.

Related: Obama's re-election drives gun sales

Later this week, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, plans to reintroduce the assault weapon ban that expired in 2004. The ban, if it passes, would outlaw the sale and manufacture of certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns, and well as magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds.

President Obama has made it clear that he will support an assault weapon ban, and sales have soared since his re-election. But such a bill will have a tough time getting past Congress.

For now, retailers can't keep tactical rifles in stock. The staff at Georgia Gun Store in Gainesville, Ga., is too busy even to take customer calls.

"Due to high sales volume we will not be answering the phone nor will we be returning phone calls," said the Georgia Gun Store's answering machine. To top of page

First Published: December 31, 2012: 5:24 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

10 states to boost minimum wage

Workers in Rhode Island will see their paychecks grow the most -- by an average of $510 a year for the average worker, according to the National Employment Law Project.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Workers in Rhode Island will see their paychecks grow the most -- by an average of $510 a year for the average worker, according to the National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit advocacy group. The state enacted a law in June raising its minimum wage 35 cents to $7.75 an hour.

In nine other states -- Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Vermont and Washington -- the minimum wage will jump between 10 and 15 cents an hour, translating to an extra $190 to $410 per year on average, according to NELP. The increases in these states are the result of state "indexing" laws that require automatic annual adjustments to keep pace with rising living costs.

"If you don't do this, the lowest wage earners are going backwards," said Jen Kern, NELP's minimum wage campaign coordinator.

Related: 2013 minimum wage, state by state

An estimated 855,000 workers will be directly affected by the wage changes, while another 140,000 are projected to be indirectly affected by the changes as employers readjust their pay scales to accommodate the new minimum, according to analysis by the Economic Policy Institute.

The new hourly rates will range between $7.35 in Missouri and $9.19 in Washington state, which has the highest minimum wage in the nation.

Workers may not notice much of a change in their paychecks, though, if lawmakers do not extend the payroll tax cut first enacted in 2010. Without the tax cut in place, workers would pay 6.2% instead of 4.2% -- an amount that could wipe out most of the wage boost.

States must pay at least the same as the federal minimum wage, which has been set at $7.25 an hour since 2009 and is not indexed to inflation. That works out to an annual income of about $15,000 -- thousands of dollars below the poverty level for a family of four.

In 2013, 19 states and the District of Columbia will have rates above the federal level.

Related: What happens if the payroll tax cut expires

The increases come at a time when a growing percentage of Americans are employed in low-wage jobs. While the Great Recession saw widespread mid-wage job losses, the majority of jobs created during the economic recovery have been low-wage positions that pay $13.83 an hour or less, according to a NELP report released in August.

Some 72% of the employees set to be affected by the wage increases are adults 20 years or older, according to a NELP analysis.

"That makes it harder to dismiss the minimum wage as some marginal labor standard," Kern said. "In fact, it's a key component of economic recovery because so many of the jobs that are now characterizing our economy are impacted by minimum wage."

Wage advocates like Kern say that increasing minimum wage rates nationwide would stimulate the economy since low-income workers are more likely to spend the extra cash. Business groups counter that increases could create new job losses. To top of page

First Published: December 31, 2012: 5:31 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fiscal cliff could put your tax refund on hold

Written By limadu on Minggu, 30 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Tax refunds could be delayed.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Congressional dithering over a fiscal cliff fix could force the Internal Revenue Service to delay the start of the filing season. So those expecting to file their returns in mid-January, when the agency usually begins accepting them, may have to wait several weeks.

If Congress doesn't approve a patch for the alternative minimum tax in the next few days, then up to 100 million taxpayers will not be able to file their returns -- or collect refunds, if owed -- until late March, said Steven Miller, the agency's acting commissioner. (The AMT itself would hit nearly 30 million filers with higher tax bills, and returns of the others would be held up while the IRS reprograms its systems.)

Filing and refunds would also be put on hold by the uncertain fate of a dozen other provisions, including the deduction for state and local sales taxes and the $250 tax break for teachers who buy their own school supplies.

This isn't the first time the IRS has had to deal with this. Two years ago, it took until mid-December for President Obama and lawmakers to reach an agreement on many of the same issues. That delayed the opening of the tax season by four weeks to mid-February, affecting some 9 million taxpayers.

Most of them were likely owed refunds, since that's who files early, said John Lieberman, managing director of Perelson Weiner, an accounting firm in New York. They are often folks whose income is just from wages and who take the standard deduction, making their returns fairly simple. Many are low-income families who file for the earned income tax credit.

"They need that money back to pay Christmas bills, for a downpayment on a car or a security deposit on an apartment," said Lieberman.

Related: Fiscal cliff confusion on Form 1040

This year, the situation is even more dire since we are only days away from the start of 2013.

While the IRS has published the Form 1040 for 2012, several lines are listed as "reserved." The designation is a "placeholder" for provisions that have yet to be passed, an agency spokesman said. The IRS has yet to publish an instruction booklet for filling out the tax forms, leaving tax preparers in a holding pattern.

"How they are going to handle this?" said John Roth, senior federal tax analyst for CCH, a tax services company. "We are in virgin territory."

The IRS spokesman declined to answer questions on how the Congressional delay will affect taxpayers, but said more information would be available shortly. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 4:44 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

S&P says fiscal cliff impasse won't spark downgrade

President Obama and congressional leaders met Friday at the White House in the latest round of fiscal cliff negotiations.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

S&P made headlines in August of 2011 by knocking the U.S. down from AAA status to to AA+ following the political wrangling over the debt ceiling. At the time, the rating agency said the affair showed "America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable."

More than a year later, S&P said Friday that this characterization "still holds."

Fellow rating agencies Moody's and Fitch still have the U.S. rated AAA, though with negative outlooks.

Fitch warned earlier this month that it may downgrade the U.S. should lawmakers fail to avoid the fiscal cliff and allow the debt ceiling to rise. Moody's has said it will strip the country's AAA rating should lawmakers fail to produce a long-term debt reduction plan.

President Obama and congressional leaders met Friday at the White House in the latest round of fiscal cliff negotiations.

Should lawmakers fail to avert the package of tax hikes and spending cuts that constitute the fiscal cliff, the U.S. economy is likely to contract by half a percent next year, with unemployment rising to 9% by 2014, S&P said. This contraction could mitigate the reduced spending and additional tax revenue that would come to the government.

Related: Fiscal cliff could put your tax refund on hold

On the other hand, should lawmakers reach a deal within the next few days, it's likely to be "insufficient to place the U.S. medium-term public finances on a sustainable footing," S&P said.

"Our existing negative outlook on the U.S. rating speaks to the risk of a deliberate further loosening of fiscal policy," the agency said.

Back in June, S&P warned that the United States could be in for another credit downgrade by 2014 if Congress doesn't come up with a plan to reduce the national debt. S&P spokesman John Piecuch said in an email Friday that the rating agency could make a downgrade decision before the end of that time frame. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 5:46 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks brace for fiscal cliff reckoning

The deadline to avert a looming fiscal crisis is fast approaching. Investors are hoping for the best, but bracing for the worst.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

For weeks, many have worried that no resolution to the fiscal cliff would lead to the kind of brutal sell-off that followed the voting down of the TARP bailout and the downgrade of America's credit rating.

Now, with the deadline fast approaching and no clear resolution in sight, strategists aren't so sure.

"I don't know how the market is going to react," said Ben Schwartz, chief market strategist at Lightspeed Financial. "But I do know that people are upset with what's going on in Washington."

The dysfunction in Washington has cast a pall over Wall Street since Election Day. But despite all the hand-wringing, stocks are currently trading at levels seen just before President Obama won a second term.

So, where do stocks go from here? Good question.

Much depends on what House lawmakers do Sunday, when they meet for a last-ditch round of budget talks. The hope is that a stopgap measure is put in place to prevent some of the tax hikes and spending cuts set to take effect on Jan. 1.

Related: Going over the cliff: What changes, what doesn't

Here are two possible outcomes:

Partial deal, modest sell-off

Like most Americans, investors view the budget impasse as an epic failure of leadership in Washington. But they still expect a deal, because doing nothing would be "political suicide" for members of both parties.

"We think they will reach some kind of agreement before the end of the year, but not until the very last minute. And it won't be much," said Kate Warne, chief investment strategist at Edward Jones.

While the details remain sketchy, investors are expecting a short-term extension of Bush-era tax breaks and a suspension of defense spending cuts, among other things.

Despite its name, many strategists say the fiscal cliff will not hit the economy right away. That could give lawmakers some time to continue negotiating, but it's unclear how long the market will tolerate such uncertainty.

Related: Real fiscal cliff deadline is inauguration

"Unlike the debt ceiling and government shutdowns in the past, not all that much changes on January first," Warne said. "But the tone will get more and more negative as time goes on."

Even with a stopgap deal, stocks could sell off, according to Peter Tuz, a portfolio manager at Chase Investment Counsel.

"It doesn't have to be sharp," he said. "A 20% drop would be astounding, but a modest drop would not be surprising."

No deal, more volatility:

Investors could be in for a rude awakening on New Year's day. Despite the political and economic stakes, it's not a given that Congress will act.

"I don't think investors have taken into account that nothing gets done," Warne said.

Wall Street vigilantes believe a sell-off may be necessary to force America's elected officials into action. But there is no guarantee that a riot in the stock market will inspire sound policymaking.

For example, the sell-off that followed the S&P downgrade did not result in a long-term solution to the debt ceiling problem, said Lawrence Creatura, a portfolio manager with Federated Clover Investment Advisors.

"The market can act as a disciplinarian, but that doesn't ensure that we get a clean and lasting solution," Creatura said. "We didn't get that last time, and it's probably not realistic to expect it this time either."

The fiscal cliff was designed to force Washington to deal with the nation's long-term debt problems, but hopes for a grand bargain have diminished as talks devolved into stalemate.

The lack of progress on structural issues, such as entitlement spending, means investors will be dealing with a certain degree of political risk long after the fiscal cliff deadline has passed.

"They're not dealing with the big issues," Tuz said. "They'll come up with a band aid approach that just delays the inevitable."

In the meantime, trading in the stock market could be volatile as investors monitor the blow-by-blow in Washington.

The market's fear gauge, the VIX (VIX)has jumped 14% over the past five days -- a sure sign that volatility is indeed on the rise.

"We're floating around here and no one has any real idea where we're going to go," Schwartz said. "That's why volatility has popped up." To top of page

First Published: December 29, 2012: 9:03 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Snapchat's 'disappearing' videos don't actually vanish

Written By limadu on Sabtu, 29 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Snapchat messages are designed to vanish seconds after they're opened, but a security probe revealed that some videos are being stored on recipients' iPhones.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Snapchat's twist is a messaging trail that self-destructs. When a user sends an image, they can choose how long the receiver has to view it, picking a timeframe of up to 10 seconds after opening. Then it vanishes.

The allure of a disappearing act frees users to send funny, embarrassing and personal images meant to leave no digital trail. (And yes, it's often used for 'sexting.') The app has been a giant hit, especially with teens. Launched one year ago, Snapchat now hosts 50 million shared images a day, according to the company. Facebook copied the feature last week for its new Poke app.

Except that in the digital realm, nothing ever seems to vanish for good. A newly discovered security flaw can resurrect Snapchat's supposedly nuked videos.

A Buzzfeed article on Thursday explained the hack, which involves opening up an iPhone file browser, navigating to a Snapchat folder, and copying videos over to your computer. Turns out that all those video files that were intended to vanish are actually being accumulated in a cache. Photos don't seem to be stored, according to Buzzfeed's tests.

Snapchat did not respond to CNNMoney's request for comment. Founder Evan Spiegel told Buzzfeed: "The people who most enjoy using Snapchat are those who embrace the spirit and intent of the service. There will always be ways to reverse engineer technology products — but that spoils the fun!"

A similar flaw also affects Facebook's Poke app, which lets users send Facebook messages and videos that disappear in seconds. Facebook (FB) acknowledged the glitch and urged users to proceed with caution.

"While Pokes disappear after they are read, there are still ways that people can potentially save them," a Facebook spokeswoman said in a written statement. "People should think about what they are sending and share responsibly."

Security experts say it's no surprise that "vanishing" messages don't disappear as completely as users expect. True privacy is a huge technical challenge, according to Robert Leshner, founder of Safe Shepherd, a personal-data protection service.

"Some of these photos and videos have to disappear from the servers of the company and have to cease to exist entirely. It's not just removing the accessibility, it's about removing the content," he said. "There are always weak links and chinks in the armor that can be discovered."

Snapchat's app icon is a ghost, intended to illustrate how its messages are fleeting and ephemeral. Now it's got an ironic kicker: Some of those missives can stick around to haunt you. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 3:16 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fiscal cliff could put your tax refund on hold

Tax refunds could be delayed.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Congressional dithering over a fiscal cliff fix could force the Internal Revenue Service to delay the start of the filing season. So those expecting to file their returns in mid-January, when the agency usually begins accepting them, may have to wait several weeks.

If Congress doesn't approve a patch for the alternative minimum tax in the next few days, then up to 100 million taxpayers will not be able to file their returns -- or collect refunds, if owed -- until late March, said Steven Miller, the agency's acting commissioner. (The AMT itself would hit nearly 30 million filers with higher tax bills, and returns of the others would be held up while the IRS reprograms its systems.)

Filing and refunds would also be put on hold by the uncertain fate of a dozen other provisions, including the deduction for state and local sales taxes and the $250 tax break for teachers who buy their own school supplies.

This isn't the first time the IRS has had to deal with this. Two years ago, it took until mid-December for President Obama and lawmakers to reach an agreement on many of the same issues. That delayed the opening of the tax season by four weeks to mid-February, affecting some 9 million taxpayers.

Most of them were likely owed refunds, since that's who files early, said John Lieberman, managing director of Perelson Weiner, an accounting firm in New York. They are often folks whose income is just from wages and who take the standard deduction, making their returns fairly simple. Many are low-income families who file for the earned income tax credit.

"They need that money back to pay Christmas bills, for a downpayment on a car or a security deposit on an apartment," said Lieberman.

Related: Fiscal cliff confusion on Form 1040

This year, the situation is even more dire since we are only days away from the start of 2013.

While the IRS has published the Form 1040 for 2012, several lines are listed as "reserved." The designation is a "placeholder" for provisions that have yet to be passed, an agency spokesman said. The IRS has yet to publish an instruction booklet for filling out the tax forms, leaving tax preparers in a holding pattern.

"How they are going to handle this?" said John Roth, senior federal tax analyst for CCH, a tax services company. "We are in virgin territory."

The IRS spokesman declined to answer questions on how the Congressional delay will affect taxpayers, but said more information would be available shortly. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 4:44 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

S&P says fiscal cliff impasse won't spark downgrade

President Obama and congressional leaders met Friday at the White House in the latest round of fiscal cliff negotiations.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

S&P made headlines in August of 2011 by knocking the U.S. down from AAA status to to AA+ following the political wrangling over the debt ceiling. At the time, the rating agency said the affair showed "America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable."

More than a year later, S&P said Friday that this characterization "still holds."

Fellow rating agencies Moody's and Fitch still have the U.S. rated AAA, though with negative outlooks.

Fitch warned earlier this month that it may downgrade the U.S. should lawmakers fail to avoid the fiscal cliff and allow the debt ceiling to rise. Moody's has said it will strip the country's AAA rating should lawmakers fail to produce a long-term debt reduction plan.

President Obama and congressional leaders met Friday at the White House in the latest round of fiscal cliff negotiations.

Should lawmakers fail to avert the package of tax hikes and spending cuts that constitute the fiscal cliff, the U.S. economy is likely to contract by half a percent next year, with unemployment rising to 9% by 2014, S&P said. This contraction could mitigate the reduced spending and additional tax revenue that would come to the government.

Related: Fiscal cliff could put your tax refund on hold

On the other hand, should lawmakers reach a deal within the next few days, it's likely to be "insufficient to place the U.S. medium-term public finances on a sustainable footing," S&P said.

"Our existing negative outlook on the U.S. rating speaks to the risk of a deliberate further loosening of fiscal policy," the agency said.

Back in June, S&P warned that the United States could be in for another credit downgrade by 2014 if Congress doesn't come up with a plan to reduce the national debt. S&P spokesman John Piecuch said in an email Friday that the rating agency could make a downgrade decision before the end of that time frame. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 5:46 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bank fines top $10 billion this year

Written By limadu on Jumat, 28 Desember 2012 | 04.32

UBS's fine for manipulating Libor capped a record year for bank fines.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

When UBS agreed earlier this month to pay U.S. authorities $1.2 billion for manipulating Libor, it capped a record year for bank fines. And the total includes only what the banks paid to U.S. and state authorities, not billions more these global banks also agreed to pay European regulators.

Slightly more than half of the fines were related to improper mortgage practices, and most of that money was earmarked to provide help to the victims.

For example, $1.5 billion of a broader mortgage settlement with major home lenders announced in February was used to set up a fund to pay borrowers whose homes were improperly sold or taken in foreclosure. Another $3.5 billion of that settlement went to state and federal governments to fund housing counselors, legal aid and other similar public programs determined by the state attorneys general.

Another $175 million was paid by Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) in a July settlement to help minority homeowners who were sold subprime loans when they qualified for less-expensive traditional mortgages.

Some victims of ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff also will benefit from the $210 million fine that a unit of Bank of New York Mellon (BK, Fortune 500) agreed to pay New York authorities for steering customers to Madoff.

But nearly half the fines -- more than $5 billion -- ended up in government coffers, mostly the U.S. Treasury's general fund.

Related: UBS's Libor charges - no longer a victimless crime

Those fines included $3.2 billion that HSBC (HBC), ING (ING) and Standard Chartered (SCBFF) paid for money laundering violations for their transactions with countries such as Cuba and Iran.

It also included about $1.56 billion in U.S. fines paid by UBS (UBS) and Barclays (BCS) for manipulating Libor, and $335 million that Deutsche Bank (DB) and Flagstar (FBC) paid for selling mortgages without disclosing the riskiness of the borrowers.

Related: Cases against UBS traders tip of the iceberg

Just about all the misdeeds were committed well before 2012. Penalties have yet to be handed down on the problems that occurred this year, such as the $5.8 billion trading loss at JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), which is now under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the FBI, or the fraud that caused the collapse of Peregrine Financial Group.

But while Peregrine was forced out of business, most of those paying these hefty bank fines can easily afford to do so.

Thomson Reuters estimates that the financial sector stocks in the S&P 500 earned $167.7 billion in profits this year, up 21% from 2011. That doesn't include earnings from major foreign banks, including UBS and HSBC, that paid some of the biggest fines. The stocks of the major banks that were hit with major fines are all up at least 20% this year, despite the large checks they had to write. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 5:13 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

You need a touchscreen for Windows 8

At $500, Asus' VivoBook laptop is the cheapest touchscreen Windows 8 PC on the market.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The ability to touch, tap, swipe and pinch on Windows 8 computers is what makes the new operating system come to life. You can still use Windows 8 without a touchscreen, but that's kind of like tossing aside the remote, getting up, and repeatedly pushing buttons to change the channel on your TV -- it's an old-fashioned drag.

Yet remarkably few people are actually buying touchscreen computers. Just 5% of Windows 8 laptops sold through Dec. 15 had touchscreens, according to the NPD Group.

One challenge is that there just aren't many touch-enabled laptops out there. Only 30 of the more than 700 laptops that Best Buy (BBY, Fortune 500) sells on its website have touchscreens, and just two touchscreen laptops ranked among the retailer's top 10 sellers.

Another sticking point: Touchscreen laptops are expensive. They'll cost you around $120 to $150 more than their non-touch-enabled equivalents. The cheapest touchscreen laptop -- the 11.6-inch Asus VivoBook -- sells for about $500, but fuller-sized touchscreen notebooks with all the latest features will set you back at least $625.

That's not hugely expensive for a laptop, but it does give many people pause when they're deciding whether touch is a feature that's worth shelling out more than a hundred bucks for.

Here's the problem: It is.

Touch features aren't an afterthought in Windows 8; they're core to the entire operating system. A swipe in from the right brings up some of the software's best new additions, like in-app search and sharing. The "options" menu is accessible with a downward swipe, navigation is done with a swipe in from the left, and a laundry list of other actions are made much simpler and intuitive with gestures. The whole Windows 8 interface just begs you to touch it.

Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) has been aggressively marketing Windows 8's touch features on TV, showing off new inventions like "picture passwords" (use a gesture, like a circle, on a chosen part of a favorite image as your log-in credential) and tablet-like apps. But consumers haven't gotten the message.

That gap contributed to Windows 8's mixed reviews. It's a clunky interface when used with a traditional keyboard-and-mouse arrangement.

Related story: Windows 8 makes you relearn how to use your PC

Getting people to adopt touch technology on their laptops won't be easy. It's not the way people are accustomed to interacting with PCs.

"The problem is everyone expected this to come out fully baked," said Stephen Baker, a consumer tech analyst at NPD. "But Windows 8 is not like anything before. It'll take time for people to get it."

Even some top industry executives haven't wrapped their heads around the concept. In April, when asked if Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) would be producing touchscreen laptops to compete with Microsoft, company CEO Tim Cook scoffed.

"You can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those things are probably not going to be pleasing to the user," Cook said on a conference call with analysts. "You wouldn't want to put these things together because you wind up compromising in both."

The price, availability and awareness obstacles that touchscreen laptops face can all be overcome. But at least two of those won't be knocked down until next summer, at the earliest.

Because today's touchscreen market is dominated by smartphones and tablets, there's been little vendor demand for the larger sizes needed for laptop screens. That means suppliers aren't making many of them, which drives up their price, according to NPD's Baker.

He predicts that increased demand will force screen makers to ramp up their large touchscreen supplies by the middle of next year. That will push more touchscreen laptop prices down into the $500 range.

"It will be a very different market by 'back to school,'" Baker said.

Will consumers take notice? If they want the best Windows 8 experience, they should. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 5:22 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Take control of your spending

NEW YORK (Money Magazine)

With 2012 winding down and 2013 fast approaching, now is an excellent time to focus on the single most effective way to build wealth and gain financial security for the long term: taking control of your spending so you can save on a regular basis.

And, indeed, Fidelity's fourth annual New Year Financial Resolutions Study shows that many people are planning to do just that in the coming year. According to Fido's survey of just over 1,000 adults, a record number, 46%, are considering financial resolutions for 2013, with saving more being the single most popular goal.

So how can you best achieve that worthy aim?

Truth is, there are a number of ways you can get a better handle on your spending and boost the amount you save. What's most important -- and most likely to lead to success -- is settling on a method that's most likely to work for you, given your temperament and your particular financial circumstances.

Some people, for example, find it convenient to use others' spending and savings habits as guideline for their own.

If you fall into that camp, you can get plenty of information about what percentage of their paychecks Americans devote to everything from their houses and cars to entertainment and gifts by going to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Expenditures Survey, a compendium of the spending behavior of just over 122,000 U.S households. If you see that your outlays deviate markedly from those of your fellow citizens in particular areas, you can decide whether it makes sense to you're your spending in those categories.

Other people prefer to sift through their own spending, looking for places they might be able to eliminate some excesses.

Related: 12 ways you're wasting money

If that approach appeals to you, you can create your own budget using tips from our MONEY 101 lesson on budgeting, rev up a budgeting software program or go to an online site like Mint.com, which helps you create a budget based on your past spending habits.

Personally, I've never been a big fan of budgeting per se. I don't think it's especially important what percentage of your income you spend on, say, vacations versus car payments. What really matters is that you save.

So I've long advocated what I call the "Two-line Budget": On the first line you enter your gross income; on the second, put the percentage of that income you intend to save, at least initially. I'd say 10% to 15% is reasonable target, although you can tweak that later one. To make sure that percentage actually gets saved, have that amount automatically deducted from your paycheck via a 401(k) plan or a mutual fund's automatic investing plan.

The idea is that once a portion of your income is going toward savings before you can even get your hands on it, you'll be forced to live on what's left and adjust your lifestyle accordingly. How you do that -- whether you choose to spend more on a fancy car, a nicer wardrobe, whatever is really a matter of personal preference.

Related: Why high earners need to save more

There are other techniques you may want to incorporate into your overall spending and saving plan, such as using a "commitment device" to help you achieve a specific savings goal or giving yourself the added incentive of a treat for reaching that goal.

Or you may simply find it easiest to take a knife to big-ticket items in your budget on the theory that they naturally provide the biggest opportunities for significant cutbacks.

Bottom line: If you're really serious about achieving a balance between spending and saving that will improve your long-term financial prospects, I suggest that you find some approach, any approach, that works for you -- and then resolve to follow it in 2013 and beyond. To top of page

First Published: December 28, 2012: 5:46 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

The rich will pay more taxes next year - no matter what

Written By limadu on Kamis, 27 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Taxes are going up on the rich in 2013 to pay for Obama's health care law no matter what Congress does.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The new levies will help foot the bill for the program to expand health care coverage for the uninsured, which involves government subsidies for lower- and middle-income Americans.

The vast majority of taxpayers will escape unscathed, however. Fewer than 2% will be subject to the new taxes, said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

Here's what's coming:

Medicare payroll tax: Single taxpayers earning more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 will have to pay an additional 0.9% payroll tax on the amount they earn above those thresholds.

Unlike traditional payroll taxes, however, this tax will be based on household income, not individual earnings. So couples may find themselves subject to it even if they each make less than $250,000.

That could lead to a surprise at tax time since employers withhold payroll taxes only on their own workers.

For instance, if a husband and wife each earn $175,000, they will owe the additional tax, but their employers likely will not have withheld it. So they will owe $900.

Related: How to survive the fiscal cliff

Investment income tax: Wealthier taxpayers with investment income could be subject to an additional 3.8% levy. Investment income includes interest, dividends and capital gains, among other things.

The formula is somewhat complicated. Only those with modified adjusted gross incomes above a threshold of $200,000, or $250,000 if married, need be concerned.

But filers don't always owe tax on all their investment income. It's just on the investment income that exceeds the threshold.

For example, if a married couple has income of $300,000, of which $275,000 is from wages and $25,000 is from investments, they would owe the tax on all the investment income, or $950 in taxes.

But if the same couple had $125,000 in investment income, they would owe tax only on $50,000, or $1,900 in taxes, because that's the amount that exceeds the threshold.

Related: Going over the Cliff - what changes, what doesn't

Deduction for medical expenses: Also, it will become harder to deduct medical expenses, though this deduction is more common among middle class taxpayers.

Until now, taxpayers could deduct medical expenses that exceeded 7.5% of their adjusted gross income. This level is rising to 10% next year.

One-third of the people who took this deduction had income in the $50,000 to $100,000 range in 2010, according to a CNNMoney analysis of Internal Revenue Service data. Only a tiny fraction of the rich took advantage of this deduction because their high incomes made it hard to reach the threshold. To top of page

First Published: December 27, 2012: 5:19 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

What happens to the economy if we go over the cliff?

It's looking like Congress might go over the fiscal cliff. A long stay over the cliff would hit the economy hard - a short one would have a less severe impact.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

What happens to the economy if lawmakers don't cut a deal and and the tax hikes and spending cuts become law?

The worst-case scenario is if Congress stands by and lets the fiscal cliff stay in effect all next year. Economists expect the U.S. economy would then fall into a recession.

Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts a drop of 0.5% in real gross domestic product and a 9.1% unemployment rate by the end of next year.

Related: What if there's no fiscal cliff deal

The good news is that no one expects Congress to let all fiscal cliff measures have their way with the economy for an extended period.

But there could still be an economic hit if lawmakers push the country over the fiscal cliff temporarily and then pass a fallback bill -- one that mostly just averts some of the tax increases.

For example, a bill passed in early January that does not address the scheduled automatic spending cuts or raise the country's debt ceiling.

In that case, economic growth could be dragged down somewhat in the first half of next year, according to estimates by economists at Goldman Sachs.

And that would come on top of a drag on growth that Goldman Sachs already expects from three things it believes are likely to happen: the expiration of the payroll tax cut, the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts on the highest-income households, and the start of the new Medicare surtax on high income earners.

Five days left. To top of page

First Published: December 27, 2012: 5:24 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks becalmed on fiscal cliff standoff

Click on chart for more premarkets data.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

U.S. stock futures were flat, with just days left for President Obama and Congress to agree to a plan that would avert tax hikes and spending cuts from kicking in automatically on Jan. 1.

Some investors are increasingly skeptical that lawmakers will resolve a self-inflicted crisis that could tip the economy into recession, while others are betting on a short-term compromise that prevents the worst and delays more difficult decisions to later in the year.

Fear & Greed Index

A letter from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Congress sent after the bell on Wednesday may also weigh on markets.

In the letter, Geithner wrote that government borrowing will hit the debt ceiling on Monday. As a result, the Treasury Department will soon start using what it calls "extraordinary measures" to prevent government borrowing from exceeding the legal limit.

Such measures include suspending the reinvestment of federal workers' retirement contributions in short-term government bonds.

Full coverage on America's Debt Challenge

Several economic reports on labor and housing markets, consumer confidence and manufacturing are due throughout the morning.

U.S. stocks faltered Wednesday as political wrangling over the fiscal cliff continued to dominate investor sentiment.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell 0.2% and the S&P 500 lost 0.5%. The Nasdaq dropped 0.7%. Tech stocks weighed the market down too.

Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500) shares slid after the company was blamed for a one-day Netflix Inc (NFLX) service disruption. Meanwhile, Marvell Technology Group (MRVL) shares tumbled, after a jury ruled against the chip maker in a $1.17 billion patent infringement case.

Overseas, European markets made narrow gains in the first trading session after the Christmas holiday. Asian markets ended mixed, with Japan's Nikkei posting the strongest gains. The index has risen nearly 10% in the past month on expectations of further monetary policy easing and new government measures to stimulate the economy. To top of page

First Published: December 27, 2012: 4:46 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Trade penalties squeeze U.S. dry cleaners

Written By limadu on Rabu, 26 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Dry cleaners are paying more for hangers since the U.S. imposed heavy trade duties on ones from Vietnam, says 3Hangers Supply Company.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

In June, the U.S. imposed temporary duties as high as 187% on hangers from Vietnam, a top exporter of wire hangers, after finding that the country was unfairly subsidizing its hanger exports. In mid-January, the U.S. will announce whether these duties will become permanent.

The trade penalty has triggered a hanger shortage and pushed up wholesale prices, said Sam Monempour, vice president of 3Hanger Supply Company. His company is paying 10% to 15% more on average for new hangers.

3Hanger used to buy all of its hangers from Vietnam. Not anymore. Some of 3Hanger's Vietnamese suppliers have either shut down completely, or relocated their manufacturing to Cambodia or Mexico to escape U.S. tariffs.

To recoup some of the rising supply costs, Monempour's company has upped its prices 1% to 2% to customers like Flora Yadegar, who operates four dry cleaners in California.

Related story: Your dry cleaning bill's about to get worse

Yadegar has tacked on 10 cents per garment to her dry cleaning prices since July to offset the higher costs. She uses as many as 500 hangers a day in her busiest location, and her bill for hangers has been steadily increasing, rising about 25% over the past five years, she said.

The added cost is putting more pressure on her business, which has been struggling in recent years, said Yadegar, 55.

Her average customer is spending $20 to $25 a week, down from $40 a week. "I used to get two suits and 8 shirts a week," she said. "Now I get maybe one suit and four shirts."

"We're already paying more for electricity, salaries, chemicals," she added. "I'm losing customers, my business is going down."

Across the street from one of her locations, two rival shops went out of business this year. While that helped bring in more customers, they didn't spend enough to boost her revenues much.

At another location, she's only making enough to pay rent and her workers. She's considering closing that shop.

Indeed, many dry cleaners are struggling these days, and higher hanger prices aren't helping, said Harry Kimmel, spokesman for industry trade group Dry Cleaning and Laundry Institute.

"The economy has hurt the industry. People aren't dry cleaning as much," said Kimmel, adding that his organization has seen membership fall steadily in recent years. "Some dry cleaners are leaving the industry and moving on to something else. Others can't afford to stay in business."

Related story: China tariffs could slam U.S. solar panel firm

Willie Gillard, 58, owns and operates Community Cleaners in Marion, S.C.

Like Yadegar, Gillard is paying more for hangers. "I used to get 500 hangers for $40. Now I get about 250," he said.

Gillard, who opened his dry cleaning business only this May, is worried. Gillard launched the firm after retiring from a 40-year factory job, hoping the business would keep him busy during retirement and help bring in some extra income.

Lately, he's feeling a little nervous about his decision because his costs are rising and he's not making any money yet.

He's debating raising his prices, but hasn't done it yet because two other dry cleaners in the area have kept their prices steady.

"I have to stay competitive [with them] or I won't get more customers," he said.

To top of page

First Published: December 26, 2012: 5:16 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Payback time: Florida homeowners foreclosing on banks

Hundreds of homeowners associations are foreclosing on banks that have failed to pay dues and other expenses on the properties they've repossessed.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Hundreds of homeowners and condo associations are foreclosing on banks that have failed to pay dues and other expenses on the properties they've repossessed.

When banks foreclose on a home they become responsible for paying fees to the homeowners association -- both any unpaid fees going back as far as 12 months and all expenses going forward.

In many cases, however, banks are failing to pay, leaving these associations short on cash, according to Miami-based attorney Ben Solomon.

But now, homeowners groups are putting liens on the properties until banks pay up and foreclosing on them if they don't.

Related: American Dream homes: Prices in 9 cities

So far, Solomon's firm has filed more than 1,100 liens against banks on behalf of homeowners and has pursued 131 foreclosures. In more than 90% of the cases, he said, the banks settle by paying the bills.

The banks' failure to pay dues has consequences. Other homeowners have to make up the difference, or the homeowners associations may lack the money they need for things like routine maintenance, security, water and garbage collection.

Don Gonzales owns a townhouse in a condo community on a golf course in Homestead, Fla., where Solomon recently filed suit to foreclose on JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) to recover $20,000 it owed on more than two years of dues and common charges.

"I own two properties and it really ticks me off when the banks don't pay their fair share," he said. "Everybody else has to make it up."

Because of the shortfall, the condo association had to cut down on security and postpone maintenance. "We haven't had our blacktop resurfaced for years: It looks terrible," he said. "We have palm trees where we used to have the coconuts taken off. It's a safety issue, but we can't do that now."

Related: There's a home price recovery but it's really, really slow

Chase would not comment on this specific case but did confirm that it is responsible for paying all dues or fees on properties it owns after foreclosure.

The Southbridge Homeowners Association in Pembroke Pines, Fla., is owed about $1 million by several owners, many of them banks that took possession after foreclosures, according to Marc Lebron, the association's treasurer. To make up for delinquent payers, Southbridge has had to hike maintenance fees to $260 from $145.

But it's also trying to get what's due. The association filed for foreclosure against Deutsche Bank (DB) last spring after the bank failed to pay fees for more than two and a half years on a home it owned since September 2009.

Deutsche and other banks claim that they are just trustees of the property and that the mortgage company servicing the account is responsible for paying the fees.

That could be the case if the mortgage servicer held the property's title after the foreclosure, said Michael Gelfand, an attorney who has instructed the Florida Bar Association on the rights of homeowners associations and banks in these cases. The title holder is responsible for the fees, he said.

Typically, however, after banks foreclose on a property they are almost always the official holder of the mortgage, said Solomon.

Related: Short sales jump ahead of tax hike

As in a vast majority of the cases Solomon has filed so far, Deutsche Bank settled. After the foreclosure paperwork was filed, the bank agreed to pay the back dues of $25,513.

Only in very rare cases do homeowners associations end up pushing the foreclosure all the way through to the auction sale of the properties. This has happened only once for Solomon.

In early November, Keys Gate Community Association in Homestead, Fla., brought a foreclosure on a property owned by mortgage servicer, NovaStar, which owed $22,890 in back dues and fees.

In mid-November, the association foreclosed on NovaStar and the home was sold at auction to a third party for $62,000, fully paying off the debts to the association. Novastar did not respond to a request for comment. To top of page

First Published: December 26, 2012: 5:29 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Starbucks makes political push on fiscal cliff

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz asks employees in D.C.-area stores to write 'Come Together' on coffee cups when serving customers.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

In a letter to Starbucks employees made public on Wednesday, Chief Executive Howard Schultz asked employees at its approximately 120 D.C.-area stores to write "Come Together" on coffee cups when serving customers on Thursday and Friday.

"Rather than be bystanders, you and your customers have an opportunity -- and I believe we all have a responsibility -- to send our elected officials a respectful but potent message, urging them to come together to find common ground," Schultz wrote.

Last week, Congress and President Obama broke for the Christmas holiday still far apart on a plan to address widespread tax increases and automatic government spending cuts starting next week. Both sides are due back by Thursday and have vowed to make a final attempt.

Schultz told CNN earlier this month that he believed the failure to reach a deal has created uncertainty among consumers and businesses and risks hurting the economy. "This single issue has a seismic effect on the rest of the world," he said.

The Congressional Budget Office has said the fiscal cliff could lead to another U.S. recession. And policymakers and investors around the world have raised concerns about its impact on the global economy.

Starbucks (SBUX, Fortune 500) plans to buy ads in the Washington Post and New York Times later in the week as part of its "Come Together" campaign.

In his letter to Starbucks employees, Schultz cites the Fix the Debt group, which has been lobbying for a deal that would avoid the fiscal cliff and put the country on a path toward a sustainable federal budget.

Fix the Debt, which has drawn the vocal participation of some high-profile CEOs, has been criticized by some on the left who say it overstates the risks of the fiscal cliff.

Schultz has not formally signed on to Fix the Debt but supports the group's efforts, according to a Starbucks spokesman.

The spokesman added that Schultz's request to write "Come Together" on coffee cups is voluntary and that employees are not required to participate if it makes them "uncomfortable."

This is not the first time Schultz has called out Washington over political gridlock. Last year, after the debt ceiling fiasco led to the downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, he said he would stop giving political donations and called on other CEOs to join him. To top of page

First Published: December 26, 2012: 7:00 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Italy's Monti may lead again, reforms key

Written By limadu on Selasa, 25 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Monti says he may be a candidate for prime minister if asked by reformist parties

LONDON (CNNMoney)

Monti stood down, and parliament was dissolved Friday, after former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi withdrew his support for Monti's unelected government of technocrats, appointed a year ago to save Italy from the financial crisis then threatening to tear the eurozone apart.

Speaking on Sunday, Monti said he was more concerned that his policies survived than taking sides in the campaign but added he was ready to offer advice and leadership if a party or coalition came forward with a program he could support.

"I would be much more interested if the Monti agenda - and I apologise if my name appears here - would serve to provide clarity and perhaps help unite the forces," he said at a news conference.

Monti, an economics professor and former European Commissioner, has been credited with restoring confidence in Italy, as well as with its eurozone partners and investors, thanks to his commitment to reduce government borrowing and introduce economic and political reforms.

"While he may not have thrown his hat into the ring, Il Professore has become Il Politico whether he likes it or not," said Nicholas Spiro, managing director of London consulting firm Spiro Sovereign Strategy.

Related: Greece may remain in euro after all

Yields on 10-year Italian government bonds have risen recently on the renewed political instability but remain way below the 7% level Monti inherited a year ago, when he succeeded Berlusconi, who resigned under a cloud of scandal.

In a taste of a bitter election campaign to come, Berlusconi criticized Monti's lack of business experience and said his government had made too many errors

"Last night I had a nightmare, I woke up screaming. I dreamed of a government still with Mario Monti as president of the council," he said, according to the transcript of an interview posted on his website.

Fiscal tightening, weak confidence and tight credit supply have kept Italy deep in recession for the past five quarters. The economy is expected to shrink by about 2.4% this year, and continue to contract in 2013. Unemployment hit 11% in October and is forecast to rise even further next year.

Related: Europe needs new ideas - Vodafone CEO

Opinion polls suggest the center-left Democratic Party led by Pier Luigi Bersani will win the lower house elections, but may need to build a coalition to gain a majority.

Bersani said in a statement on his website that he had no reason to apologize for supporting Monti's program in government and would consider his policy proposals carefully.

Analysts at Nomura said a Bersani-led government including Monti in some capacity was the "best case" likely outcome for financial markets but cautioned that even such a government may struggle to implement reforms, particularly if it failed to win a majority in the upper house.

"Given all this political uncertainty, we see a non-negligible risk that markets will become unsettled over Italy again early in the new year," wrote Alastair Newton in a research note.

-- CNN's Alex Felton contributed to this article To top of page

First Published: December 24, 2012: 9:47 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks tumble as fiscal cliff deadline nears

Click for more market data.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The Dow Jones industrial average fell 0.4%. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq both lost about 0.3%. U.S. markets closed at 1 p.m. ET and will remain dark Tuesday for the Christmas holiday.

With time running out, investors are increasingly concerned about the lack of progress in talks over tax hikes and spending cuts set to kick in automatically on Jan. 1, known as the fiscal cliff.

Stocks fell 1% on Friday after a plan by Speaker John Boehner to avert the fiscal cliff failed to get enough support in the House late Thursday. President Obama spoke about the negotiations Friday evening before leaving for the holiday, urging a scaled-back deal that would stop taxes from rising on 98% of Americans -- something both sides say they want.

No one expects progress on a deal Monday, with members of Congress having left Washington for their homes to celebrate the Christmas holiday.

Related: What happens to stocks if we go over fiscal cliff?

But investors are still holding out hope for a temporary fix before the end of the year, said Mark Luschini, chief investment strategist at financial advisory firm Janney Montgomery Scott. Such a deal would only forestall the immediate crisis and delay more difficult decisions until later next month, he added.

"If they can avert the worst, the market will find some support," said Luschini. "Absent that, we will definitely see some pressure on equities."

Fear & Greed Index

Most federal offices and many businesses were closed on Monday. There are no economic reports or corporate news scheduled for release.

European markets ended a holiday-shortened day mixed, with markets in Germany closed. Italy's Mario Monti said this weekend he may consider a second term as prime minister if asked by parties committed to the economic reforms he began over the past 12 months.

Asian markets ended slightly higher, while markets in Japan were closed.

The U.S. dollar rose versus the euro, British pound and Japanese yen. In the bond market, U.S. Treasuries were lower, with the 10-year note yielding 1.78%. Oil prices fell while gold prices edged higher. To top of page

First Published: December 24, 2012: 9:41 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

New deal to give MF Global customers more money

Written By limadu on Senin, 24 Desember 2012 | 04.32

Trustees reached a deal that will likely return an estimated $500 million to $600 to MF Global's U.S. brokerage estate.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The trustee trying to recover funds for MF Global customers announced that a settlement was reached on Friday. Under the deal an estimated $500 million to $600 million will be returned to the U.S. brokerage estate, which has been giving money back to customers.

Many of the firm's roughly 38,000 customers were left in the lurch after MF Global collapsed in October 2011, when its disclosure of billions of dollars worth of bets on risky European debt sparked panic among investors.

The firm was left scrambling for cash to make good on its obligations and ended up tapping customer funds, failing to replace them in violation of industry rules and leaving a shortfall of $1.6 billion.

Customers who traded on U.S. exchanges have since received roughly 80% of their money back. But customers trading on foreign exchanges have just recovered 5%.

Related: MF Global FAQ

James Giddens, a trustee appointed to unwind MF Global's estate, said in a statement that the deal resolves disputes between MF Global's brokerage division and its London operations. He said the agreement would result in "significant" additional payouts for clients.

The deal must be approved by a U.S. bankruptcy judge, who is expected to hear the case at the end of January. To top of page

First Published: December 23, 2012: 12:24 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Clock ticking on mortgage tax break for struggling homeowners

Struggling homeowners with principal reductions may have to pay more in taxes if the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act is not extended by the end of the year.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

If the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 does not get extended by Congress by the end of the year, homeowners will have to start paying income taxes on the portion of their mortgage that is forgiven in a foreclosure, short sale or principal reduction.

That means if someone owes $150,000 on their home and it sells for $100,000 in a foreclosure auction, they could owe taxes on the remaining $50,000. For someone in the 25% tax bracket, that would mean paying $12,500 in taxes on the foreclosure. Similar taxes would apply for amounts that were forgiven in short sales and principal reductions.

"Allowing the act to expire would harm these families and their communities and it would run counter to current loss mitigation efforts," wrote Tim Pawlenty, president of the Financial Services Roundtable, Mike Calhoun, president of the Center for Responsible Lending, and John Dalton, president of the Housing Policy Counsel in a letter to the Senate Finance Committee.

So far, though, very little has been done to extend the act as Republicans and Democrats continue to butt heads over the fiscal cliff.

Related: Fallout from fiscal cliff inaction

Many mortgage borrowers would be affected. More than 50,000 homeowners lose homes to foreclosure each month. Meanwhile, the number of short sales has tripled over the past three years to a rate of about half a million a year. And, under the terms of the $25 billion foreclosure abuse settlement, roughly one million borrowers may have their mortgage debt lowered through principal reductions over the next couple of years.

"If there ever was a no-brainer in housing policy, this would be it," said Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst for Guggenheim Securities.

Congress may return to the act after the other fiscal cliff issues are resolved, but by then the housing market will have taken a hit, said Elise Brooks Perkins, communications director for the Financial Services Roundtable. "It can be done retroactively, but the lag time will have a chilling effect on homeowners considering a short-sale," she said.

Related: There's a home price recovery but it's really, really slow

Most short sellers will not follow through on sales to closing without debt forgiveness in place. Instead they'll fight foreclosure, prolonging the housing crisis.

Congressman Brad Miller, however, said he doesn't see debt forgiveness passing unless it's part of a larger fiscal cliff deal.

Still, the price tag for such an exemption could make it a point of contention, said Seiberg. The office of Sen. Max Baucus, who heads the Senate Finance Committee, estimated the cost of a one-year extension at $1.3 billion.

Even if Congress allowed the mortgage debt forgiveness to expire, not all borrowers who lose their home to foreclosure, sell their home in a short sale or have their principal reduced will take a tax hit. If the debt is discharged in a bankruptcy, no tax is due. And anyone who is insolvent -- meaning they have more debt than assets -- at the time the debt was forgiven would not have to pay the tax.

And in some states like California, certain borrowers are protected against paying the tax because of the way the state treats foreclosures. To top of page

First Published: December 24, 2012: 6:33 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks: Little to cheer as holiday begins

Click the chart for more premarket data.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

U.S. stock futures were lower ahead of the open, following a broad decline in stocks Friday due to the gridlock in Washington talks aimed at avoiding the fiscal cliff.

Expect low trading volumes on Monday with markets in the U.S. closing at 1 p.m. for the holiday, which could cause some volatility.

Related: What happens to stocks if we go over fiscal cliff?

President Obama spoke about fiscal cliff negotiations Friday evening, before leaving for the holiday, urging a scaled back deal that would stop taxes from rising on 98% of Americans -- something both sides say they want.

But there is likely to be little progress on a deal Monday, with members of Congress at home for the Christmas holiday.

Fear & Greed Index

Most federal offices and many businesses were closed on Monday. So there is nothing in the way of economic reports or corporate news scheduled for release.

European markets were steady in a shortened trading session, with markets in Germany closed. Italy's Mario Monti said at the weekend he may consider a second term as prime minister if asked by parties committed to the economic reforms he began over the past 12 months.

Asian markets ended slightly higher, while markets in Japan were closed. To top of page

First Published: December 24, 2012: 3:57 AM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

EPA study supports more natural gas

Written By limadu on Minggu, 23 Desember 2012 | 04.32

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

"As the administration and EPA has made clear, natural gas has a central role to play in our energy future," the agency said in a press release. "The administration continues to work to expand production of this important domestic resource safely and responsibly."

EPA outlined several steps it's taking to assess the impacts fracking -- short for hydraulic fracturing -- has on the nation's water supply, as directed by Congress in 2009.

Steps include:

-- Analyzing existing data from natural gas companies on chemicals and practices used

-- Modeling how discharging waste might impact the water

-- Lab testing on water discharge

-- Testing fracking chemicals for toxicity

-- Testing groundwater in five regions near drilling activity

As expected, the study contained no new data or conclusions. The final results are not expected until late 2014.

Related: World's 10 most expensive energy projects

Some see the lack of data or negative comments in Friday's progress report as a positive for the industry.

"It signals that the Obama administration has no real appetite for additional federal regulations until 2014 at the earliest," said Nitzan Goldberger, a natural gas analyst at Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. "That's good news for the oil and gas guys."

The Obama administration has tightened some rules around fracking, but for the most part has left regulation up to the states.

Fracking involves injecting massive amounts of water, sand and some chemicals deep underground in a bid to crack shale rock and ease the flow of oil and natural gas.

The process has unleashed an energy boom in the United States, creating thousands of jobs, driving down the price of oil and natural gas and cutting energy imports to levels not seen in decades.

But it's also raised serious concerns over its effects on the environment, including air pollution from trucks and wells, its links to earthquakes and fears that it is contaminating drinking water.

For environmentalists, the negatives seem to outweigh the positives.

Fracking was once seen by some environmentalists as a technology that, given the proper regulations, could be done safely and provide a fuel that emits far fewer greenhouse gases than coal. Natural gas was seen as a good alternative to coal, at least until renewables like wind and solar were ready for prime time.

But declining costs for renewables, more instances of water contamination, uncertainly over the heat-trappng nature of natural gas that escapes from wells unburned, and a fear that cheap gas is crowding out wind and solar have led many to change their minds.

Several environmental groups are calling for an immediate ban on fracking, while others favor a gradual phase out combined with greater federal regulation.

On the other side are many analysts and economists that believe this technology can give the United States a significant economic and geopolitical advantage. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 2:54 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

Going over the cliff: What changes, what doesn't

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may need to do some heavy lifting to pass a fiscal cliff deal in the Senate, after House Speaker John Boehner's so-called Plan B did not garner enough support in the House.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The good news: It won't be the end of the world.

The bad news: Going over the cliff could create problems that no one should have to deal with, simply because Congress and the White House couldn't get the job done on time.

Practically speaking, however, there is likely to be a "grace period" of a couple of weeks during which Congress could pass a deal to ward off the bulk of scheduled tax increases and spending cuts. And there are ways both may be postponed temporarily while lawmakers work that out.

Your paycheck: If you'll be paid during the first week in January, your company's payroll processor will probably be cutting your check during Christmas week. So far, however, the IRS hasn't told the payroll companies how much tax to withhold for 2013.

Unless new withholding tables are issued, payroll processors will continue to use 2012 withholding rates for the early January paychecks. In that sense, your paycheck in early January won't be much different than what it was in late December.

But your paycheck still could be smaller, because the 2% payroll tax holiday is expiring. Starting in January, workers will once again have 6.2% of their wages up to $113,700 withheld to pay for Social Security, up from the 4.2% rate that's been in effect for the past two years.

Effectively that means someone making $50,000 might get about $83 less a month in their paychecks. Someone making twice that would see their pay reduced by roughly $167 a month.

If you're getting a bonus, you'll likely have more withheld there, too, said Michael O'Toole, senior director of government relations for the American Payroll Association. That's because there's one supplemental withholding rate that applies to bonuses. This year it's 25%, but it's set to rise to 28% on Jan. 1, unless Congress decides to change it.

For paychecks that will be cut during the second, third and fourth weeks of January, payroll processors will likely continue to use 2012 income tax withholding tables if they've heard nothing from Treasury and the IRS by that point, O'Toole said.

CNN: Breakdown of support for Plan B

There also is some debate whether Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner will have the authority to tell employers that they should continue to use the 2012 withholding tables until further notice if he chooses.

The other option, of course, is that the IRS could issue new withholding tables reflecting 2013 law, which means everyone's tax rates will go up officially on Jan. 1. In that case, paychecks that are processed in January will have more withheld than they do currently.

If, as expected, Congress eventually chooses to extend the Bush tax cuts for all but the highest earners, adjustments would need to be made for paychecks that went out earlier in the year.

Treasury did not indicate to CNNMoney whether it would issue new withholding tables by Jan. 1.

Your 401(k) and IRA: There's no telling how markets will respond if fiscal cliff gridlock persists into 2013.

They've been relatively sanguine so far. But that may not be the case going forward.

After news that House Speaker John Boehner tabled Plan B because it lacked sufficient support, U.S. stocks fell Friday by just under 1%. World markets also ended the day modestly in the red.

Then again, some believe, markets may not move much on fiscal cliff news - whether Congress cuts a deal soon or not.

Your 2012 tax return: Here's where things potentially become a dumb mess. The IRS warned lawmakers that if they don't act to protect the middle class from having to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax for tax year 2012 by Dec. 31, up to 100 million taxpayers may not be able to file their 2012 taxes until late March.

That would mean their refunds will be delayed. And they wouldn't be injecting those refunds into the economy during the first quarter.

Based on Treasury Department records from the past three years, refunds paid during January, February and March combined have ranged from $117 billion to $136 billion.

Related: What's in the fiscal cliff?

Government spending: Unless lawmakers avert the so-called sequester, a series of automatic cuts will reduce the budgets of most federal agencies and programs by 8% to 10%.

But that doesn't necessarily mean those cuts would have to occur immediately, according to a former official with the Office of Management and Budget.

Both the White House budget office and federal agencies themselves will have some latitude to postpone the cuts from occurring "for several weeks if necessary," added OMB Watch, a group that monitors the federal budget.

The White House Budget Office did not respond to questions from CNNMoney.

Doctors' pay: Absent a fiscal cliff deal that includes a so-called "doc fix," Medicare physicians are facing a nearly 27% cut in their payments for treating Medicare patients.

But here again there may be a few weeks' grace period for Congress to change its mind and reverse the cut. That's because a claim submitted will be paid no less than two weeks after it's received.

Unemployment benefits: A federal extension of unemployment benefits is set to expire. If Congress does not renew it, workers who lost their jobs after July 1, 2012, will only receive up to 26 weeks in state unemployment benefits, down from as many as 73 weeks in state and federal benefits that have been available in 2012. As a result, more than 2 million of the long-term unemployed will run out of benefits in January, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group.

If Congress chooses early next year to keep the extension in place, and makes the extension retroactive, then many of the 2 million who fell off the rolls may be paid retroactively, said Rick McHugh, a NELP staff attorney. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 4:39 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Dairy cliff': Milk prices may double in New Year

If Congress doesn't act on an expiring protection for dairy farmers before Jan 1, milk prices could double.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

With Congress spending all its time trying to avert the fiscal cliff, a slew of other legislative matters are going unattended. One of them is the agriculture bill which, if not addressed, could lead to a doubling of the price of milk early next year.

It works like this: In order to keep dairy farmers in businesses, the government agrees to buy milk and other products if the price gets too low. The current agriculture bill has a formula that means the government steps in if the price of milk were to drop by roughly half from its current national average of about $3.65 a gallon.

Problem is, the current bill expired last summer, and Congress had been unable to agree on a new one. Several protections for farmers have already expired, and several more are set to do so over the next few months. One of them is the dairy subsidy, which expires January 1.

But instead of leaving farmers entirely out in the cold, the law states that if a new bill isn't passed or the current one extended, the formula for calculating the price the government pays for dairy products reverts back to a 1949 statute. Under that formula, the government would be forced to buy milk at twice today's price -- driving up the cost for everyone.

"If you like anything made with milk, you're going to be impacted by the fact that there's no farm bill," U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack told CNN's Candy Crowley in an interview on State of the Union airing Sunday, Dec. 30.

"Consumers are going to be a bit shocked when instead of seeing $3.60 a gallon for milk, they see $7 a gallon for milk. And that's going to ripple throughout all of the commodities if this thing goes on for an extended period of time," Vilsack said.

Related: Independent farms rake in millions

Sky-high milk prices wouldn't necessarily be good for dairy farmers either, according to Chris Galen, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation, which represents over 30,000 dairy farmers.

While it might provide a short term boost to profits, there's a fear that consumers would either cut back on dairy or opt for imported dairy products. It could also force food makers to search for alternatives to dairy, like soy.

"We call it the dairy cliff," Galen said.

Fortunately, there's still time for Congress to act.

Galen said the government would have to issue a notice saying it was going to pay the increased price for dairy products, then set up a schedule for when purchases would start, a process that could take a few weeks.

"It's not like people would dump blocks of cheese on the USDA's front lawn January first," he said.

To prevent the price spike, Congress either needs to extend the current bill, pass a new bill, or enact some provision to keep the 1949 law from taking effect.

Given the current state of the fiscal cliff talks and Congress' inability to get things done in general, dairy lovers might want to stock up now. To top of page

First Published: December 21, 2012: 3:31 PM ET


04.32 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger